Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 11;15(9):e04718. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4718

Table G.14.

Summary of concentration–response analysis of incidence of vomiting in dogs reported by Hughes et al. (1999)

Models Number of parameters Minus Log‐likelihood p‐value AIC BMC10 BMCL10 Comment
(mg/kg feed)
Full model 7 8.97 na 31.94 na na
Null (reduced) model 1 23.37 < 0.001 48.74 na na
Probit 2 12.62 0.20 29.23 6.91 4.90 Not selected
Logistic 2 12.86 0.17 29.71 6.87 4.90 Not selected
LogProbit 2 12.28 0.25 28.56 6.85 5.17 Selected
LogLogistic 2 12.51 0.22 29.02 6.79 4.92 Not selected
Multistage Failed
Multistage Cancer 1 14.73 0.07 31.46 4.22 2.48 Not selected
Quantal‐Linear 1 16.61 0.02 35.21 2.32 1.39 Not selected
Weibull 2 12.75 0.18 29.49 6.79 4.65 Selected
Gamma 2 12.39 0.34 26.77 6.83 5.05 AIC minimum

DON: deoxynivalenol.

The models selected to identify the lowest BMCL10 following EFSA guidance (EFSA Scientific Committee, 2017) are identified in the column ‘Comments’ and include the model with the lowest AIC.

BMC10: benchmark concentration response of 10%; BMCL10: 95% lower confidence limit for the benchmark concentration response (BMR) of 10%; na: not available, including cases where the BMC/Ls were not calculated, the fit was incomplete, or serious or conflicting comments were noted (e.g. parameters reaching boundary).