Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 11;15(9):e04718. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4718

Table G.17.

Summary of dose–response analysis of incidence of vomiting/retching in mink exposed to DON reported by Wu et al. (2013a)

Models Number of parameters Minus Log‐likelihood p‐value AIC BMD10 BMDL10 Comment
(mg/kg bw per day)
Full model 5 2.70 na 15.40 na na
Null (reduced) model 1 20.53 1 43.06 na na
Probit 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.037 0.010 Selected
Logistic 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.043 0.012 Selected
LogProbit 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.029 0.0067 Selected
LogLogistic 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.037 0.0067 Selected
Multistage 2 no fit
Multistage Cancer 1 3.11 0.94 8.22 0.013 0.0037 Selected
Quantal‐Linear 1 4.45 0.48 10.89 0.0044 0.0022 Not selected
Weibull 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.032 0.0055 Selected
Gamma(a) 2 2.70 1 7.41 0.029 0.0057 AIC minimum

The models selected to identify the lowest BMDL10 following EFSA guidance (EFSA Scientific Committee, 2017) are identified in the column ‘Comments’ and include the model with the lowest AIC.

AIC: area under the curve; BMD10: benchmark dose response of 10%; BMDL10: 95% lower confidence limit for the benchmark dose response (BMR) of 10%; bw: body weight; na: not available, including cases where the BMD/Ls were not calculated, the fit was incomplete, or serious or conflicting comments were noted (e.g. parameters reaching boundary).