Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 11;15(9):e04718. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4718

Table G.19.

Summary of dose–response analysis of incidence of vomiting/retching in mink exposed to 15‐Ac‐DON reported by Wu et al. (2013a)

Models Number of parameters Minus Log‐likelihood p‐value AIC BMD10 BMDL10 Comment
(mg/kg bw per day)
Full model 5 2.70 na 15.50 na na
Null (reduced) model 2 20.53 na 43.06 na na
Probit 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.070 0.018 Selected
Logistic 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.084 0.019 Selected
LogProbit 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.047 0.0060 Selected
LogLogistic 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.071 0.0061 Selected
Multistage Failed
Multistage Cancer 1 2.81 0.99 7.62 0.025 0.0047 AIC minimum
Quantal‐Linear 1 3.66 0.75 9.32 0.0074 0.0035 Selected
Weibull 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.057 0.0042 Selected
Gamma 2 2.70 1 9.41 0.0053 0.0041 Selected

The models selected to identify the lowest BMDL10 following EFSA guidance (EFSA Scientific Committee, 2017) are identified in the column ‘Comments’ and include the model with the lowest AIC.

BMD10: benchmark dose response of 10%; BMDL10: 95% lower confidence limit for the benchmark dose response (BMR) of 10%; bw: body weight; na: not available, including cases where the BMD/Ls were not calculated, the fit was incomplete, or serious or conflicting comments were noted (e.g. parameters reaching boundary).