Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 1;15(8):e04922. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4922

Table 6.

Overview of comparative analysis studies for the three‐event stack maize MON 87427 ×MON 89034 × NK603

Study focus Study details Comparator Commercial non‐GM maize reference varietiesa
Agronomic and phenotypic analysis Field trials, 2010, USA, eight locationsb Maize MPA636B Nineteenc
Compositional analysis Field trials, 2010, USA, eight locationsd Maize MPA636B Twenty‐twoe

GM: Genetically modified.

a

Four different varieties were grown at each location.

b

Jackson County, Arkansas; Clinton County, Illinois; Cumberland County, Illinois; Stark County, Illinois; Pawnee County, Kansas; Shelby County, Missouri; York County, Nebraska; and Miami County, Ohio.

c

NC+ 5411; Burrus 645; DKC61‐50; DKC62‐30; Fielder's Choice NG6778; Fontanelle 4924; H‐9180; Kruger K‐0210; Legacy L6600; Lewis 6014; Lewis 7007; Midland Phillips 799; Midland Phillips 7B15P; Midwest Genetics 78130; Mycogen 2M746; NK N72‐G8; Pioneer 32B81; Stewart S588; and Triumph 1416.

d

Jackson County, Arkansas; Clinton County, Illinois; Jefferson County, Iowa; Stark County, Illinois; Pawnee County, Kansas; Shelby County, Missouri; York County, Nebraska; and Miami County, Ohio.

e

Burrus 645; Cornbelt ×6043; DKC61‐50; DKC62‐30; Fielder's Choice NG6778; Fontanelle 4924; H‐9180; Kruger K‐0210; Legacy L6600; Legacy L6673; Lewis 6014; Lewis 7007; Midland Phillips 799; Midland Phillips 7B15P; Midwest Genetics 78130; Mycogen 2M746; NC+ 5411; NK N72‐G8; Pioneer 32B81; Stewart S518; Stewart S588; and Triumph 1416.