Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 5;10(2):e01522. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1522

Table 2.

Regression coefficients between maternal prepregnancy BMI per 5 unit increments and total hippocampal volume and hippocampal subfield volumes in boys, (N = 37)

Region Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
Hippocampus
β (SE) −134.97 (54.35) −103.84 (41.94) −103.55 (42.60) −113.05 (44.26) −126.98 (47.26)
p‐value .018* .018* .021* .016* .012*
CA1
β (SE) −26.88 (11.83) −21.67 (10.46) −21.19 (10.46) −21.57 (10.87) −23.58 (11.71)
p‐value .029a .046 .051 .057 .054
CA2/3
β (SE) −13.20 (4.82) −11.05 (4.25) −11.26 (4.24) −12.44 (4.47) −14.19 (4.73)
p‐value .010a .014 .012 .009a .006a
CA4
β (SE) −10.98 (4.67) −8.38 (3.68) −8.55 (3.68) −9.63 (3.92) −10.34 (4.22)
p‐value .025a .029 .026 .020a .021a
Dentate gyrus
β (SE) −12.30 (5.44) −9.16 (4.17) −9.29 (4.21) −10.36 (4.52) −11.31 (4.86)
p‐value .030a .035 .034 .029a .027a
Subiculum
β (SE) −13.98 (7.76) −10.49 (6.81) −10.17 (6.80) −11.80 (7.01) −12.51 (7.58)
p‐value .080 .13 .14 .10 .11

Model 1: unadjusted.

Model 2: adjusted for ICV.

Model 3: adjusted for ICV + child age.

Model 4: adjusted for ICV + child age + SES +maternal gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) status.

Model 5: adjusted for ICV + child age + SES +maternal GDM status + BMI z‐score.

a

Denotes significance remained after FDR correction for multiple subfields at a threshold of q = 0.05.

*

Significance level at p < .05.