Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 5;10(2):e01522. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1522

Table 3.

Regression coefficients between maternal prepregnancy BMI per 5 unit increments and total hippocampal volume and hippocampal subfield volumes in girls, (N = 51)

Region Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
Hippocampus
β (SE) 45.51 (59.31) 54.26 (47.96) 51.66 (49.12) 61.39 (52.33) 28.78 (55.35)
p‐value .45 .26 .30 .25 .61
CA1
β (SE) 10.83 (14.95) 13.07 (11.96) 11.54 (12.19) 14.37 (13.01) 7.56 (13.89)
p‐value .49 .28 .35 .28 .59
CA2/3
β (SE) −2.53 (6.03) −1.88 (5.11) −0.37 (5.08) 0.25 (5.46) −1.44 (5.91)
p‐value .68 .72 .94 .96 .81
CA4
β (SE) −1.04 (5.43) −0.39 (4.72) 0.01 (4.83) 0.55 (4.98) −1.59 (5.35)
p‐value .85 .93 >.99 .91 .77
Dentate gyrus
β (SE) −1.53 (6.51) −0.61 (5.59) −0.50 (5.73) 0.40 (5.95) −2.53 (6.37)
p‐value .82 .91 .93 .95 .69
Subiculum
β (SE) 2.72 (7.76) 3.30 (7.16) 2.35 (7.29) 2.97 (7.90) −0.61 (8.48)
p‐value .74 .65 .75 .71 .94

Model 1: unadjusted.

Model 2: adjusted for ICV.

Model 3: adjusted for ICV + child age.

Model 4: adjusted for ICV + child age + SES +maternal gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) status.

Model 5: adjusted for ICV + child age + SES + maternal GDM status + BMI z‐score.