Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 30;13(1):39–46. doi: 10.1007/s12265-019-09906-0

Table 1.

Sex differences in currently available parameters to quantify coronary perfusion

Parameter name (abbreviation) Method used to calculate perfusion Imaging modalities using this parameter to quantify perfusion Sex differences
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) Pd/Pa at maximal hyperaemia CAG None reported [4552]
Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) Pd/absolute coronary flow at maximal hyperaemia CAG None reported [45, 48]
Coronary flow reserve (CFR) Hyperaemic coronary flow/basal coronary flow CAG, PET, echocardiography, CMR Ratio possibly lower in women [48]
Myocardial blood flow (MBF) Absolute myocardial perfusion in mL/min/g PET, CMR

Rest and stress MBF higher in women.

MBF ratio lower in women [53]

Myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) Myocardial perfusion in stress/myocardial perfusion in rest CMR Not yet reported

CAG coronary angiography, CMR cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, Pa mean proximal coronary artery pressure (mean aortic pressure), PET positron emission tomography, Pd mean distal coronary artery pressure