TABLE 1.
Type | Controller | Monitor | Main characteristic | Drawback | Strength |
Pre-digital | – Human operation | – Human observation | – Distributed control and distributed administration | – Human error | – Low capital investment |
– High variability | – Lower maintenance cost | ||||
– Less automation | |||||
– Low efficiency | |||||
HSCSa | – Microcomputers | – Analog/digital detectors | – Distributed control and central administration | – High capital investment and maintenance cost | – High automation |
– Point-to-point communication of signals | – Complex wiring | – High efficiency | |||
– Function redundancy | – Complex control strategy | ||||
– Low interoperability | |||||
FOCSb | – Computers | – Digital detectors | – Distributed control and central administration | –Communication constraint of fieldbus | – Simplicity, accuracy, low maintenance cost |
FCSc | – Smart devices | – Smart sensors | – Signals communication via fieldbus | – Signal delay and packet loss | – High interoperability, stability |
– Complex control strategy | |||||
NCSd | – Networked computers | – Digital detectors | – Distributed control and central administration | – Communication constraint of network | – High efficiency, low maintenance cost |
– Smart devices | – Smart sensors | – Signals communication via network | – Signal delay and packet loss | – High interoperability, stability | |
– Risk of cyber-attack | – Advanced management |
aHierarchical structure control system, including PLC and DCS systems; bFlat organizational control system; cFieldbus control system; dNetwork control system.