TABLE 3.
Genetic differentiation of Pseudocercospora musae populations estimated by the DEST index (inferior triangle) and gene flow (Nm) (superior triangle).
| Populationsa | Pop 1 | Pop 2 | Pop 3 | Pop 4 | Pop 5 | Pop 6 | Pop 7 | Pop 8 | Pop 9 | Pop 10 |
| Pop 1 | – | 13.62 | 499.50 | 499.50 | 499.50 | 4.24 | 3.13 | 6.44 | 499.50 | 6.49 |
| Pop 2 | 0.04 | – | 499.50 | 7.97 | 73.03 | 5.60 | 3.25 | 84.25 | 499.50 | 5.23 |
| Pop 3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | – | 499.50 | 499.50 | 4.41 | 3.73 | 9.13 | 499.50 | 8.95 |
| Pop 4 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | – | 499.50 | 4.26 | 3.57 | 14.84 | 499.50 | 11.61 |
| Pop 5 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | – | 3.62 | 4.15 | 8.97 | 499.50 | 8.92 |
| Pop 6 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.12 | – | 61.23 | 499.50 | 499.50 | 5.86 |
| Pop 7 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.01 | – | 499.50 | 499.50 | 10.71 |
| Pop 8 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | – | 499.50 | 499.50 |
| Pop 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | – | 499.50 |
| Pop 10 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | – |
aPopulations analyzed: Distrito Federal – Pop 1: Estação Biológica (EB); Pop 2: Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC); Pop 3: Fazenda Canaã (FC); Pop 4: São João da Aliança (SJA); Pop 5: Chácara Santos (STO). Bahia; Pop 6: Bom Jesus da Lapa (BJL); Pop 7: Tancredo Neves (TaNe); Pop 8: Itajuípe (ITJ). Minas Gerais; Pop 9: Lavras (LV). Rio Grande do Norte; Pop 10: Baraúna (BRN).