Table 3.

Statistical analysis of binding potentials of pathogenic bacteria between each yeast probiotic (LYA and LYB) and paraprobiotic (CWA, CWB, and CWC) based on SEM observations

Bacteria	LYA vs. LYB	LYA vs. CWA	LYA vs. CWB	LYA vs. CWC	LYB vs. CWA	LYB vs. CWB	LYB vs. CWC	CWA vs. CWB	CWA vs. CWC	CWB vs CWC
A. pyogenes	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.036	0.039	0.042	1.000	1.000	1.000
B. fragilis	< 0.001	0.222	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.997	0.176	0.033	< 0.001	0.106
C. difficile	0.946	0.007	0.1114	0.0109	< 0.001	0.013	< 0.001	0.865	1.000	0.876
C. perfringens	0.995	0.860	0.8584	< 0.001	0.952	0.657	< 0.001	0.409	< 0.001	< 0.001
E. coli O157:H7	0.998	0.794	0.0435	0.9970	0.607	0.058	0.974	0.011	0.967	0.036
F. necrophorum	< 0.001	0.009	0.997	0.1756	0.222	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.033	< 0.001	0.106
L. monocytogenes	0.965	0.598	0.9999	0.9647	0.802	0.944	1.000	0.567	0.854	0.945
P. assacharolytica	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	1.000	1.000	1.000
S. Dublin	0.001	0.004	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.989	0.560	0.986	0.298	0.868	0.868
S. Enteritidis	0.919	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.191	0.974	0.642
S. Heidelberg	0.999	0.989	0.345	0.9296	0.972	0.372	0.876	0.200	0.998	0.104
S. Typhi	0.950	< 0.001	0.967	0.4914	< 0.001	1.000	0.876	< 0.001	0.016	0.866
S. Typhimurium	0.858	0.972	0.8199	0.6970	0.522	0.301	0.999	0.985	0.421	0.268