Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;20:47. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1033-9

Table 2.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the responding general dentists (GDs)

Belarus Lithuania Macedonia Moldova Romania
mean ± sd mean ± sd mean ± sd mean ± sd mean ± sd
Age (years) 40.7 ± 11.8 36.6 ± 11.5 41.1 ± 9.5 44.4 ± 10.5 35.7 ± 9.0
Significant differences: Lithuania/Romania vs. Moldova/Macedonia/Belarus(p < 0.001)*
Practice (years) 12.6 ± 11.7 20.0 ± 10.0 13.8 ± 8.9 23.3 ± 7.7 18.1 ± 11.8
Significant differences: Lithuania/Macedonia vs. Moldova/Romania/Belarus (p < 0.001)*
Gender N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
 Males 87 (22.3) 75 (15.4) 172 (49.3) 146 (46.2) 148 (36.9)
 Females 303 (77.7) 413 (84.6) 177 (50.7) 170 (53.8) 253 (63.1)
Significant across-country differences (p < 0.001)**
Location of practice
 Urban 370 (94.9) 421 (86.3) 296 (85.1) 249 (78.8) 348 (87.7)
 Semi-urban/rural 20 (5.1) 67 (13.7) 44 (12.6) 67 (21.2) 49 (12.3)
 Significant differences: Lithuania/Macedonia/Romania/Belarus vs. Moldova (p < 0.001)**
Working in a group practice
 Yes 315 (80.8) 389 (79.7) 110 (31.5) 202 (63.9) 278 (70.4)
 No 75 (19.2) 99 (20.3) 239 (68.5) 114 (36.1) 117 (29.6)
Significant across-country differences (p < 0.001)**
Having a periodontist in your practice#
 Yes 216 (55.4) 144 (29.5) 109 (31.2) 13 (4.1) 43 (11.6)
 No 174 (44.6) 344 (70.5) 240 (68.8) 303 (95.9) 292 (78.7)
Significant differences: Lithuania & Macedonia vs. Moldova/Romania/Belarus (p < 0.001)**
Having a dental hygienist in your practice
 Yes 74 (19.0) 279 (57.2) 110 (31.5) 14 (4.4) 26 (7.2)
 No 316 (81.0) 209 (42.8) 239 (68.5) 302 (95.6) 334 (92.8)
Significant across-country differences (p < 0.001)**

*Comparison of means using One-way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni adjustment

** Comparison of proportions using Chi2 test