Table 2.
Papers citing issue | |
---|---|
Research use | |
Research not always used to inform policy and practice decisions | [48–56] |
Examples of LMIC researchers successfully getting evidence used | [43, 48, 49] |
Factors influencing KT | |
Researchers’ reputation/credibility/contextual understanding | [32, 49, 50, 57–68, 127] |
Relevance and credibility of research evidence | [32, 49, 50, 53, 54, 58, 60, 62–67, 70–72, 127] |
Contrasting views, demands and incentives among researchers and policy-makers in relation to research, its use, policy actor roles and policy-making | [32, 49, 50, 57, 59–61, 67, 70, 73–78] |
Nature of policy issues (technical versus contested versus interest of policy-maker) | [49, 58–62, 67, 70, 76, 79] |
Political context | [32, 48–51, 53, 58, 59, 62, 64, 67, 80, 81, 127] |
Decision-makers’ research background | [51, 55, 57, 65, 77] |
Donor influence | [51, 54, 55, 57–60, 70, 71, 127] |
International influence, e.g. WHO | [54, 58, 59, 65, 67, 70, 71, 75, 77, 80, 82–84] |
Table illustrates extent of use of research and factors influencing use of research that were commonly cited by researchers in the studies included in the review. A listed factor was considered commonly cited if it was reported in three or more studies