Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;20:23. doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1561-6

Table 2.

Mitochondrial introgression across the flat periwinkle samples included in this study indicated as the number (and percentage) of individuals from one species carrying mitochondrial typical haplotypes from the other species. Codes are the same as in Table 1. Individuals were classified into species using morphology and nuclear markers except for those marked witha

Locality N COI + Cyt-b Introgression
Code (males/females) N (%)
L. obtusata
 (1) oUS1a 10 (NA)
 (2) oUS2a 8 (NA)
 (3) oICa 10 (NA)
 (4) oSCa 9 (NA)
 (5) oNO1 15 (9/6)
 (6) oNO2 3 (1/2)
 (7) oSW1 12 (9/3)
 (8) oSW2 12 (10/2)
 (9) oWA1 12 (8/4) 1 (8%)
 (10) oWA2 9 (6/3) 4 (44%)
 (16) oSP3 34 (24/10)
 (17) oPT1 32 (24/8)
Total 166 5 (3%)
L. fabalis
 (3) fICa 3 (NA)
 (5) fNO1 12 (4/8) 6 (50%)
 (6) fNO2 8 (5/3) 4 (50%)
 (7) fSW1 11 (11/0) 8 (73%)
 (8) fSW2 11 (11/0) 11 (100%)
 (9) fWA1 9 (9/0)
 (10) fWA2 9 (9/0)
 (11) fIR 7 (7/0)
 (12) fEN 7 (7/0) 1 (14%)
 (13) fFR 8 (8/0)
 (14) fSP1 21 (14/7) 7 (33%)
 (15) fSP2 29 (22/7) 4 (14%)
 (18) fPT2 22 (10/12)
Total 157 41 (26%)

aIndividuals from these sites were classified into species based on nuclear markers alone