Table 2.
Locality | N COI + Cyt-b | Introgression |
---|---|---|
Code | (males/females) | N (%) |
L. obtusata | ||
(1) oUS1a | 10 (NA) | |
(2) oUS2a | 8 (NA) | |
(3) oICa | 10 (NA) | |
(4) oSCa | 9 (NA) | |
(5) oNO1 | 15 (9/6) | |
(6) oNO2 | 3 (1/2) | |
(7) oSW1 | 12 (9/3) | |
(8) oSW2 | 12 (10/2) | |
(9) oWA1 | 12 (8/4) | 1 (8%) |
(10) oWA2 | 9 (6/3) | 4 (44%) |
(16) oSP3 | 34 (24/10) | |
(17) oPT1 | 32 (24/8) | |
Total | 166 | 5 (3%) |
L. fabalis | ||
(3) fICa | 3 (NA) | |
(5) fNO1 | 12 (4/8) | 6 (50%) |
(6) fNO2 | 8 (5/3) | 4 (50%) |
(7) fSW1 | 11 (11/0) | 8 (73%) |
(8) fSW2 | 11 (11/0) | 11 (100%) |
(9) fWA1 | 9 (9/0) | |
(10) fWA2 | 9 (9/0) | |
(11) fIR | 7 (7/0) | |
(12) fEN | 7 (7/0) | 1 (14%) |
(13) fFR | 8 (8/0) | |
(14) fSP1 | 21 (14/7) | 7 (33%) |
(15) fSP2 | 29 (22/7) | 4 (14%) |
(18) fPT2 | 22 (10/12) | |
Total | 157 | 41 (26%) |
aIndividuals from these sites were classified into species based on nuclear markers alone