Table 2.
Risk of bias assessment using JBI’s critical appraisal tools for cross sectional studies
Items for critical appraisal | Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | Were confounding factors identified? | Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Overall appraisal | Quality of the evidence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
studies | yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | ||
Rooban et al. [48] | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | Included | moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reece [49] | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | Included | High | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kayal et al. [50] | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | Included | moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
D’Amore et al. [51] | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | High | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gupta et al. [52] | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | moderate |