Table 3.
Risk of bias assessment using JBI’s critical appraisal tools for cohort studies
Items for critical appraisal | Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? | Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? | Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Were confounding factors identified? | Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? | Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? | Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? | Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? | Overall appraisal | Quality of the evidence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
studies | yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | ||
Thomson et al. [53]. | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | Included | High |