Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;25(2):e328–e334. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0627

Table 3.

GVHD characteristics of the efficacy and safety populations

Characteristics Primary efficacy population (n = 49) Safety analysis population (n = 71)
Prior GVHD treatment
Failed steroids alone 49 (100%) 49 (69%)
Failed steroids + other(s) 0 12 (17%)
Undertreated 0 10 (14%)
Baseline GVHD grade
Grade 2 13 (27%) 22 (31%)
Grade 3 27 (55%) 33 (46%)
Grade 4 9 (18%) 16 (23%)
Visceral GVHD
Yes 41 (84%) 58 (82%)
GVHD onset before HSCT Day 100
Yes 34 (69%) 52 (73%)
MB risk groupa
Low 8 (17%) 12 (17%)
High 39 (83%) 57 (83%)
Median MB score (range) 0.47 (0.10–0.92) 0.46 (0.10–0.96)
Median log10ST2 (range), ng/mL 5.52 (4.74–6.11) 5.50 (4.74–6.33)
Median time from HSCT to ruxolitinib (range), days 66 (25–298) 74 (25–357)

graphic file with name ONCO-25-e328-g003.jpg

a

Biomarker data available for 47 patients in the efficacy population and 69 patients in the safety population.

Abbreviations: GVHD, graft‐versus‐host disease; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; MB, MAGIC biomarker 17; ST2, suppressor of tumorigenicity 2.