Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 11;36(1):134–142. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12259

Table 3.

Comparison of data of echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing between high‐PVC burden and low‐PVC burden

 

Low‐PVC burden (≤0.145%/d)

(N = 241)

High‐PVC burden (>0.145%/d)

(N = 194)

P value
Holter monitoring
NSVT 30 (12.4%) 109 (56.1%) <.001
Multifocal PVCs 188 (78.0%) 187 (96.3%) <.001
Echocardiography
IVST (mm) 11.4 ± 3.2 11.1 ± 2.6 .340
LVEDD (mm) 50.6 ± 10.2 57.5 ± 11.3 <.001
LVESD (mm) 36.7 ± 11.9 45.4 ± 12.9 <.001
PWT (mm) 11.1 ± 2.5 11.2 ± 3.3 .965
LVEF (%) 49.9 ± 16.6 41.2 ± 15.3 <.001
LAD (mm) 42.2 ± 8.2 45.4 ± 9.9 .001
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Peak VO2 (ml·kg−1·min−1) 16.4 ± 5.0 15.0 ± 3.9 .021
VE/ VCO2 slope 32.9 ± 7.7 34.3 ± 6.9 .173

Abbreviations: IVST, interventricular septum thickness; LAD, left atrial diameter; LVEDD, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD, left ventricular end‐systolic diameter; NSVT, non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia; peak VO2, peak oxygen uptake, and VE/ VCO2 slope, rate of increase in ventilation per unit increase in carbon dioxide; PVC, premature ventricular complex; PWT, posterior wall thickness.