Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;16(1):148–157. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1640428

Table 3.

Correlation between infected spouses and viral serological markers in the vaccinated group.

    2006
2014
  Sample size(%) HBsAg positive (%) RR (95%CI) Anti-HBc positive (%) RR (95%CI) Single anti-HBs positive (%) RR (95%CI) Sample size(%) HBsAg positive (%) RR (95%CI) Anti-HBc positive (%) RR (95%CI) Single anti-HBs positive (%) RR (95%CI)
Infected wives                          
 Yes 15 (27.78) 2 (13.33) 2.60 (0.40–16.82) 9 (60.00) 1.67 (0.93–3.01) 2 (13.33) 0.43 (0.11–1.71) 30 (34.88) 1 (3.33) 0.62 (0.07–5.73) 8 (26.67) 1.15 (0.54–2.46) 10 (33.33) 0.78 (0.43–1.40)
 No 39 (72.22) 2 (5.13) ref 14 (35.9) ref 12 (30.77) ref 56 (65.12) 3 (5.36) ref 13 (23.21) ref 24 (42.86) ref
Infected husbands                          
 Yes 40 (51.28) 3 (7.50) - 13 (32.50) 1.24 (0.62–2.47) 17 (42.50) 0.95 (0.57–1.57) 37 (38.95) 1 (2.70) 0.52 (0.06–4.84) 6 (16.22) 0.86 (0.35–2.11) 20 (54.05) 0.95 (0.66–1.38)
 No 38 (48.72) 0 (0) - 10 (26.32) ref 17 (44.74) ref 58 (61.05) 3 (5.17) ref 11 (18.97) ref 33 (56.90) ref

Note: *Two-sided p-value <0.05; **two-sided p-value <0.01; ***two-sided p-value <0.001; ref = references which were used to compared with another group when calculated the RR value.