Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 3;15(1):1706024. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2019.1706024

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Contrary effects on leaf growth by gaining of CUC2 function in cuc2-1D mutants. A-C, Silhouette of fourth rosette leaf of wild-type (Col-0) (a), cuc2-3 (b) and cuc2-1D mutants (c), 40 DAG. Scale Bars = 2 mm. D, Time course of the dynamics of the total leaf area. *, Significant enlarged (Student’s t-test p < .05) in comparison with Col-0 and cuc2-3 mutant leaves of the same age. Note that each genotype did not show any significant difference between 36 and 40 DAG indicating the leaf growth of all three genotypes terminated around 36 DAG. E, Antagonistic dynamics of the leaf width at the 1st tooth tips and at the sinuses between the 1st and 2nd tooth of the fourth rosette leaf of Col-0 and cuc2-1D mutants, 40 DAG. D-E, N = 10 (24–36 DAG), N = 20 (40 DAG); ± SE. Significant changes (Student’s t-test, *, p < .05, **, p < .01) between Col-0 and cuc2-1D mutant leaves of the same age.