Table 1.
Study design clearly described |
Administrative database comparative study |
Administrative database case-control study |
Administrative database case series |
Why database was created clearly stated |
Description of database’s inclusion/exclusion criteria |
Description of methods for reducing bias in database |
Codes and search algorithms reported |
Rationale for coding algorithm reported |
Code accuracy reported |
Code validity reported |
Clinical significance assessed |
Is the period of data consistent with the outcome data? |
Statement regarding whether data stems from single or multiple hospital admissions |
Statement regarding whether data stems from single or multiple procedures |
Accounting for clustering |
Adapted from Hashimoto et al. Administrative database studies: Goldmine or goose chase?
Evid Based Spine Care J 2014;5:74–6.