Table 3.
Study designs | Advantages regarding CKDu | Disadvantages regarding CKDu |
---|---|---|
Prospective longitudinal studies | • Better view of the natural history of
disease-incompletely understood in
CKDu • Permit collection of a broader range of biomarkers over time • Exposure analysis over time • Test different hypotheses-etiology of CKDu is unknown |
• Expensive-insufficient sample
size may limit scope or power of study • Require stable residential populations-many affected workers are migrants • Results available only after years of follow-up |
Retrospective case-control studies | • Comparisons of different locales and
populations-which may explain different presentations in
different regions • Comparisons of affected and unaffected members of the same community • Define susceptibility factors |
• Depends heavily on the case
definition-which is still being
debated • Focus on late stage disease-interventions may be more valuable early in younger, less affected individuals • Survivor bias |
Flexible study designs | • Case-only or case-control studies could be embedded within a prospective study | • Need sufficient power to examine variety of etiologies and biospecimens |