Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2019 Aug 2;96(5):1071–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.06.024

Table 3.

Study Design Considerations

Study designs Advantages regarding CKDu Disadvantages regarding CKDu
Prospective longitudinal studies • Better view of the natural history of disease-incompletely understood in CKDu
• Permit collection of a broader range of biomarkers over time
• Exposure analysis over time
• Test different hypotheses-etiology of CKDu is unknown
• Expensive-insufficient sample size may limit scope or power of study
• Require stable residential populations-many affected workers are migrants
• Results available only after years of follow-up
Retrospective case-control studies • Comparisons of different locales and populations-which may explain different presentations in different regions
• Comparisons of affected and unaffected members of the same community
• Define susceptibility factors
• Depends heavily on the case definition-which is still being debated
• Focus on late stage disease-interventions may be more valuable early in younger, less affected individuals
• Survivor bias
Flexible study designs • Case-only or case-control studies could be embedded within a prospective study • Need sufficient power to examine variety of etiologies and biospecimens