Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Interpers Violence. 2019 May 14;36(17-18):8050–8069. doi: 10.1177/0886260519848785

Table 1.

Characteristics of Study Respondents.

Variable Full Sample M (SD)/Frequency TGNC (n/%) Cisgender Male (n/%) Cisgender Female (n/%)
Age in years 21.69 (2.12) 21.75 (2.10) 22.15 (2.11) 21.53 (2.13)
Gender identity
 Cisgender woman 50.8%
 Cisgender man 13.6%
 TGNC 35.6%
Sexual orientation identity
 Heterosexual 2.3% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0%
 Lesbian 17.5% 7.9% 0.0% 28.9%
 Gay 14.1% 10.4% 72.9% 1.1%
 Bisexual 25.7% 17.5% 14.6% 34.4%
 Queer 20.9% 34.1% 8.3% 15.0%
 Pansexual 12.1% 12.7% 0.0% 15.0%
 Asexual 4.0% 7.1% 0.0% 2.8%
 Other non-heterosexual identity 5.7% 10.3% 4.2% 2.8%
IPV victimization
 Psychological abuse 54.5% 65 (51.6%) 27 (56.3%) 101 (56.1)
 Identity abuse 30.5% 47 (37.3%)*** 12 (25.0%) 49 (27.2%)
 Physical abuse 29.7% 38 (30.2%) 19 (39.6%) 48 (26.7%)
IPV-related services
 Housing 7 (1.9%) 7 (5.5%)** 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
 Mental health services 134 (37.8%) 58 (46.0%)** 10 (20.8%) 66 (36.6%)
 Medical care 77 (21.7%) 37 (29.3%)* 6 (12.5%) 34 (18.8%)
 Support services 63 (17.7%) 32 (25.3%)* 6 (12.5%) 26 (14.4%)

Note. Statistical significance for gender identity evaluated by MANOVA. TGNC = transgender and gender nonconforming; IPV = intimate partner violence; MANOVA = multivariate analyses of variance.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.