Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;15(2):e0228499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228499

Table 5. Spatial autoregressive (SAR) model results using urban tree canopy cover (UTCC) and ecosystem service dollars (ESD) as response variables.

MI PP PM WOHS WUDG MYHB PR L/R ΔAIC
East New York SEM UTCC (**) * ns (***) ns ns (***) *** -1845.5
ESD ns ** ns (**) ns ns ns *** -2486.0
SLAG UTCC (***) ** ns (***) ns ns (***) *** -1910.7
ESD ns *** ns (**) *** ns ns *** -2542.2
Philadelphia SEM UTCC ** ns (*) ns ** ** ns *** -887.5
ESD ** ns (*) ns ** ** ns *** -928.3
SLAG UTCC ** ns ns ns ** *** ns *** -897.4
ESD ** ns ns ns ** *** ns *** -937.2
Washington SEM UTCC ns ns ns ns ns ns ns *** -300.4
ESD ns ns ns ns ns ns ns *** -326.7
SLAG UTCC ns ns ns ns ns ns ns *** -309.8
ESD * ns ns ns ns ns ns *** -337.4
Midwest Chicago SEM UTCC Ns ns ns ns ns (***) (***) *** -979.0
ESD Ns ns ns ns ns (***) (***) *** -1008.1
SLAG UTCC Ns ns * (*) * (***) (***) *** -1016.1
ESD * ns * (*) * (***) (***) *** -1046.0
Cleveland SEM UTCC Ns ns Ns Ns *** ns ns *** -100.3
ESD Ns ns * Ns *** ns ns ** -103.7
SLAG UTCC Ns ns Ns Ns *** ns (*) *** -100.4
ESD Ns ns Ns Ns *** ns Ns *** -102.5
Pittsburgh SEM UTCC Ns ns * (*) Ns ** (***) *** -117.8
ESD Ns ns * (*) Ns * (***) *** -126.4
SLAG UTCC Ns ns *** (*) Ns * (***) *** -121.1
ESD Ns ns *** Ns Ns * (***) *** -130.8
West Los Angeles SEM UTCC *** ns (***) (*) * (*) (***) *** -1121.7
ESD *** ns (***) (*) * (*) (***) *** -1217.1
SLAG UTCC *** *** (***) (*) ns (***) (***) *** -1091.7
ESD *** *** (***) ns ns (***) (***) *** -1190.7
Sacramento SEM UTCC Ns ns (**) ns ** (***) * *** -167.6
ESD Ns ns (***) ns ** (***) ns *** -114.4
SLAG UTCC Ns ns ns ns ** (***) ns *** -162.7
ESD * ns ns ns ** (***) ns *** -124.3
San Diego SEM UTCC ** ns (***) ns ns ns ns *** -190.6
ESD * ns (***) ns ns ns ns *** -196.1
SLAG UTCC *** ns ns ns ns ns (**) *** -202.4
ESD ** ns ns ns ns ns (**) *** -206.2

SEM: Spatial Error Model; SLAG: Spatial Lag Model; UTCC: Urban Tree Canopy Cover; ESD: Ecosystem Service Dollars per square kilometer; MI: Median Income; PP: Percent Poverty; PM: Percent Minority; WOHS: Percent without a High School Degree; WUDG: Percent with an Undergraduate Degree; MYHB: Median Year Home Built; PR: Percent Renters; PD: Population Density; L/R: Lambda or Rho, Spatial Coefficients; Delta AIC: SAR AIC value minus OLS AIC value. Red cells with no parentheses around asterisks indicate positive relationships; Blue cells with parentheses around asterisks indicate negative relationships. Yellow highlighted and bolded cells in the delta AIC column indicate the SAR model with the greatest decrease in AIC value between equivalent SEM and SLAG models. All SAR models had lower AIC values relative to OLS models.

* denotes p < 0.05

** denotes p < 0.01

*** denotes p < 0.001.