Table 3. Estimates of proportional mortality in epilepsy by cause in population-based and clinical cohort studies.
Study | Country-location | Design | Quality (%) | Number of people with epilepsy followed | Number of deaths | Causes of death (%) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct | Indirect | Unrelated | Undetermined | ||||||
Ngugi (2014)35 | Kenya-rural | Population | 100 | 606 | 61 | 44.3 | 11.4 | 34.3 | 9.8 |
Kaiser (2007)31 | Uganda-rural | Population | 90 | 61 | 18 | 33.0 | 17.0 | 44.4 | 5.6 |
Nicoletti (2009)34 | Bolivia-rural | Population | 85 | 103 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50 | 20 |
Banerjee (2010)7 | India-urban | Population | 80 | 337 | 20 | 5 | 30 | 45 | 20 |
Kamgno (2003)32 | Cameroon-rural | Population | 60 | 271 | 37 | 75.5 | 10.8 | 13.7 | |
Mu (2011)33 | China-rural | Population | 50 | 2,998 | 106 | 21.6 | 58.8 | 19.6 | |
Ding (2013)29 | China-rural | Population | 50 | 1,986 | 206 | 14.1 | 32.5 | 39.3 | 14.1 |
Carpio (2005)27 | Mali-rural/urban | Population | 40 | 36 | 13 | 38.0 | NR | 62.0 | NR |
Summary: all population-based | 6,546 | 471 | 27.3a | 20.0a | 41.9a | 14.1a | |||
Carpio (2005)27 | Ecuador-urban | Clinical cohort | 50 | 379 | 7 | 42 | 30 | 28 | |
Almeida (2010)36 | Brazil-urban/rural | Clinical cohort | 45 | 550 | 16 | 62.5 | |||
Terra (2011)38 | Brazil-urban | Clinical cohort | 35 | 987 | 53 | 15.1 | 84.9 | ||
Jilek-Aall (1992)12 | Tanzania-rural | Clinical cohort | 35 | 164 | 110 | 17.3 | 18.2 | 32.7 | 31.8 |
Terra (2010)39 | Brazil-urban/ rural | Clinical cohort | 25 | 267 | 9 | 77.8 | |||
Devilat (2004)37 | Chile-Santiago | Clinical cohort | 5 | NR | 16 | 39.3 | |||
Summary: all clinical cohorts | >2,347 | 211 | 39.3a | 24.1a | 47.6a |
Median percentage.