Table 2.
Comparative Model Fit of Latent Profile Solutions
| Fit indices | Number of DTT Profiles | Number of PRT Profiles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTT | DTT | DTT | PRT | PRT | PRT | |
| 2 Profiles | 3 Profiles | 4 Profiles | 2 Profiles | 3 Profiles | 4 Profiles | |
| Loglikelihood | −1862.090 | −1796.662 | −1717.596 | −1498.259 | −1344.832 | −1195.974 |
| AIC | 3774.180 | 3661.324 | 3521.192 | 3046.518 | 2757.664 | 2477.948 |
| BIC | 3858.792 | 3776.396 | 3666.725 | 3131.131 | 2872.737 | 2623.481 |
| Entropy | 0.916 | 0.868 | 0.777 | 0.964 | 0.942 | 0.950 |
| Adjusted LRT | p=0.10 | p=0.09 | p =0.18 | p< 0.01 | p=0.09 | p=0.69 |
| Bootstrapped LRT | p< 0.01 | p< 0.01 | p< 0.01 | p< 0.01 | p< 0.01 | p< 0.01 |