TABLE 3.

Results of mixed-effects model and post hoc comparisons on delta changes in all children.

Neuropsychological outcome	Within-baseline effect+	Post hoc comparison	Training Effect®	Post hoc comparison
	Estimated mean (CI)	p	Estimated mean (CI)	p
Forward Corsi Block Tapping test	0.05(−1.03,1.13)	0.992	−1.03(−2.55,0.49)	0.211
Backward Corsi Block Tapping test	−1.29(−2.54,−0.03)	0.044*	1.61(−0.15,3.37)	0.075
Matrix Path test	0.36(−6.55,5.83)	0.985	10.29(−1.60,18.99)	0.017*
Time in naming condition	1.51(−16.78,19.81)	0.971	−180.08(−205.86,−154.30)	0.001*
Errors in naming condition	2.00(−1.02,5.03)	0.221	−6.94(−11.18,−2.71)	0.001*
Self-correcting responses in naming condition	2.07(−0.32,4.46)	0.096	−9.58(−12.94,−6.22)	0.001*
Time in inhibition condition	−16.26(−41.66,9.14)	0.245	−212.83(−248.63,−177.036)	0.001*
Errors in inhibition condition	5.42(−0.76,11.60)	0.091	−23.63(−32.29,−14.96)	0.001*
Self-correcting responses in inhibition condition	−0.57(−3.59,4.73)	0.912	−9.23(−15.06,−3.40)	0.001*
Little Frogs test	−4.91(−10.99,1.18)	0.125	8.78(0.23,17.33)	0.043*
Pippo Says test	0.07(−2.32,2.47)	0.997	−3.31(−6.68,0.06)	0.055

Legend: ⁺Within-baseline effect, differences during normal academic program in both experimental conditions, calculated by adding delta changes at baseline in experimental condition B (T1–T0 for experimental condition B) and in follow-up in experimental condition A (T2–T1 for experimental condition A); ^® Training Effect, differences during e-Rob training in both experimental conditions, calculated by adding delta changes for time points T1 and T0 for experimental condition A and delta changes for time points T2 and T1 for experimental condition B; * statistical significant differences (p < 0.05).