Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;11:79. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00079

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the patients included in the exploratory analysis.

Poor response to IS (N = 32)a Good response to IS (N = 15) Pb
Age [Years–Median (IQR)] 44 (22.7) 46 (13) ø
Male n (%) 23 (72) 9 (60) ø
Ethnicity n (%) ø
Asian: Black: White 4(12.5): 3(9.4): 25(78.1) 2(13.3): 2(13.3): 11(74.3)
Cause of renal failure n
DM ø
APKD 2 ø
GN 10 7 ø
SLE 1 1 ø
HT 2 1 ø
Congenitalc 8 1 ø
TINd 5 1 ø
Cystinosis 2 ø
HUS 1 ø
CNI toxicity 1e ø
Unknown/not recorded 2 2 ø
Transplant history
Deceased: LRD: LURD 22: 8: 2 6: 6: 3 ø
Previous transplants: 0: 1 26: 6 14: 1 ø
Time from Tx [years-median (IQR)]
HLA MM [Mean (SD)]
12.8 (14.4) 16.6 (12.7) ø
Overall 2.9 (1.4) 3.3 (1) ø
A: B: 1.1(0.6): 1.1(0.7) 1(0.8): 1.3(0.7) ø
DR 0.7 (0.5) 1.2 (0.5) *
HLA Ab status
CRF [Mean (SD)] 48.1 (13.9)g 42.7 (37.7) ø
DSA+ n (%) 17 (53) 11 (74.3) ø
-Class I: Class II: Both 10(31): 3(9.7): 4(12.9) 3(20): 5(33.3): 3(20) ø
-NA 15 (47) 4 (26.7) ø
DSA MFIf [Mean (SD)] 4437 (6627) 6758 (8998) ø
Enrolment biopsy scoresmedian
(IQR)
C4d glomh 3 (1) 3 (1) ø
Banff C4d (PTC) 2 (2) 2 (2) ø
Bannf g 2 (1) 1(2) ø
Banff ptc 1 (2) 1 (1) ø
Banff cg 2 (2) 1 (1) ø
Banff cv 1 (1) 1.5 (1) ø
Banff ct 1 (1) 1 (1) ø
Banff ci 1 (1) 1 (1) ø
TA/IF (%) 25 (14) 20 (20) ø
Baseline immunosuppression n (%)
Tac: CsA 19 (59): 6 (19) 8 (53): 7 (47) ø
MPA; Azathioprine 22 (69): 5 (16) 9 (60): 5 (33) ø
Baseline renal function [Mean (SD)]
Creatininei 184.8 (51.7) 168.7 (44.8) ø
eGFRj 37.7 (11.6) 38.6 (11.3) ø
1/creat slope −0.15 (0.23) −0.07 (0.07) ø
Formally deteriorating 23 (72) 10 (67) ø
PCRk [Mean (SD)] 213 (211) 74 (74)
PCR >50 27 (84) 8 (53) *
Post-optimization medication
Tac n (%) 31 (97) 15 (100) ø
Tac level [Mean (SD)] 5.4 (2.7) 7.0 (2.2) *
MPA n (%) 30 (94) 15 (100) ø
MPA dose [mg (SD)] 953 (493) 1,000 (422) ø
On ACE-I n (%) 20 (62.5) 6 (40) ø
On ARB n (%) 22 (68.8) 12 (80) ø
a

All who were eligible for RCT + the patient (G008) who developed a contraindication to Rituximab during phase 1.

b

P value, comparing good response to optimized IS (N=15) to all poor response to optimized IS, eGFR>20 (N = 32).

c

Including Alports.

d

Including chronic pyelonephritis.

e

Heart transplant recipient.

f

No HLA Ab data available on 1 recruit.

g

Cumulative - includes those with DSA = 0.

h

Scored as C4d PTC.

i

μmol/L.

j

mls/min/1.73 m2.

k

mg/mmol.

ø

P, NS.

P ≤ 0.005.

*

P < 0.05.

1° renal diagnosis: DM, diabetes mellitus; APKD, adult polycystic kidney disease; GN, glomerulonephritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; HT, hypertension; TIN, tubulointerstitial nephritis; HUS, haemolytic uraemic syndrome; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; Tx type: LURD, living unrelated donor; LRD, living-related donor; HLA MM: Number of Class I (A,B) and Class II (DR) mismatches. Two patients (B003 and W007) had their transplants abroad and tissue typing was unavailable. HLA Ab status: CRF, calculated reaction frequency; DSA, donor specific antibody; MFI, cumulative median fluorescence intensity. Means are shown for whole group, including those with MFI of 0. Enrolment biopsy scores: g, glomerular inflammation; ptc, peritubular capillary inflammation; c, chronic scores; TA/IF, tubular atrophy/interstital fibrosis; Immunosuppression: Tac, Tacrolimus; CsA, ciclosporin; MPA, Mycophenolic acid or mycophenolate mofetil. Baseline renal function: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (4 value MDRD); Formally deteriorating, meet criteria for deteriorating function based on analysis of 1/creatinine plot; Medication: ACE-I, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor: ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker.