Table 2.
Interpretation based on pattern of anti-donor responsiveness | Number of samples (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Enrolment (n = 43)* | Post-optimization (n = 128) | Total (n = 171) | |
No response | 26 (60.5%) | 89 (69.5%) | 115 (67.3%) |
CD25+ or CD19+ regulated | 8 (18.6%) | 29 (22.6%) | 37 (21.6%) |
B-dependent—no regulation | 8 (18.6%) | 8 (6.3%) | 16 (9.3%) |
Not viable/Not interpretable | 1 (2.39%) | 2 (1.6%) | 3 (1.8%) |
This analysis is of samples from 43 of the 47 recruits included in the exploratory analysis, who had enrolment PBMC collected.
Comparing enrolment vs. post-optimization patterns in a Fisher 2 × 3 exact probability test [(No response + regulated response) vs. B-dependent responses vs. non-viable], p = 0.04.
Refer to Supplementary Tables 7, 8 to see the individual ELISPOTs from all 43 patients included in this table.