Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;9:1561. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01561

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses of the prognostic effect on OS of the sarcopenia vs. non-sarcopenia group in head and neck cancer.

Variable Subgroups Availability Effect Heterogeneity
Studies
(N)
Patients
(N)
HR
(95% CI)
P-values I2 (%) pinter
Race Asian
Non-Asian
4
6
678
1,793
2.11 [1.59, 2.81]
1.92 [1.64, 2.25]
<0.00001
<0.0001
39
0
0.5
Stage Locally advanced 4 837 1.92 [1.35, 2.73] 0.0003 49 0.95
Non-metastasis 5 1,520 2.04 [1.71, 2.42] <0.0001 0
Contained M1 1 114 1.94 [1.04, 3.55] 0.04
Primary SMI L3 6 1,128 2.12 [1.66, 2.71] <0.00001 7 0.47
C3 4 1,343 1.90 [1.60, 2.25] <0.00001 0
Cutoff Group1 3 708 2.41 [1.72, 3.38] <0.0001 0 0.45
Group2 3 1,056 1.87 [1.47, 2.38] <0.00001 14
Group3 4 707 1.92 [1.53, 2.41] <0.00001 0
NOS quality NOS ≥ 7
NOS = 6
6
4
1,410
1,061
2.13 [1.74, 2.60]
1.83 [1.48, 2.26]
<0.0001
<0.00001
0
8
0.3
HR data extract Directly
Indirectly
8
2
2,138
333
2.11 [1.81, 2.47]
1.50 [1.11, 2.03]
<0.00001
0.008
0
0
0.05

*Pinter represents the significance of heterogeneity between subgroups calculated by Revman software.

Cutoff value in Group 1: 38.5 cm2/m2 for women and 52.4 cm2/m2 for men; Group 2: 30.3–31 cm2/m2 for women and 42.4–49 cm2/m2 for men; Group 3: 41–43.2 cm2/m2 for women and 41–43.2 cm2/m2 for men.

N, number; HR, hazards ratio; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.