Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;10:1413. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01413

Table 3.

Neuroimaging studies investigating NP within the SCI cohort.

References Modality Region of interest(s) Statistical correction Main findings
Jutzeler et al. (55) sMRI Whole brain;
M1, S1, S2, PMC, insula, thalamus, ACC as regions of interests
p < 0.05 FWE correction SCI-NP vs. SCI-no NP:
(Whole brain):↔ GMV
(Regions of interest):
↑ GMV in L ACC and R M1
Pain intensity correlated positively with GMV in R M1
↓ GMV in R S1 and bilateral thalamus.
Mole et al. (56) sMRI Whole brain:
M1, S1, thalamus,
L posterior cingulate, R insula as regions of interests
p < 0.001 uncorrected;
p < 0.05 FWE correction
SCI-NP vs. SCI-no NP:
↓ GMV in bilateral S1. Pain intensity correlated negatively with GMV in S1
↓ WMV deep to S2
Min et al. (59)§ rsfMRI Bilateral M1,
SMA, S1, S2, BG, dlPM, vlPM
p < 0.05, k = 64
FDR correction
SCI-pain vs. SCI-no pain: n/a
Yoon et al. (57) sMRI
DTI
PET
Whole
brain
sMRI and PET:
p < 0.001 uncorrected,
p < 0.05 SVC with 10 mm spheres;
DTI: p < 0.05 TFCE
SCI-NP vs. SCI-no NP: n/a
Gustin et al. (58) DTI Whole
brain
p < 0.005 uncorrected,
k = 20
SCI-NP vs. SCI-no NP:
↓ MD of ventral pons to midbrain. ↑ MD of R PPC, R dorsolateral PFC, L anterior insula, mOFC, PMC, L amygdala, and R ventroposterior thalamus.
MD values of dorsolateral PFC, PPC, anterior insula and PMC were positively correlated with pain intensity.
MD values of amygdala and ventroposterior thalamus were negatively correlated with pain intensity. ↔ FA.
Widerström- Noga et al. (60) MRS Thalamus Independent t tests
p < 0.05
SCI-NP high pain vs. low pain:↓ NAA/Ins and Glx/Ins
Gustin et al. (61) MRS Thalamus Independent t tests
p < 0.05
SCI NP vs. SCI no NP:NAA/Cr and GABA/Cr
Widerström-Noga et al. (62) MRS ACC Independent t tests
p < 0.05
SCI-NP high pain vs. low pain:Ins, Cr and Cho ↓ NAA/Ins and Glx/Ins
SCI-NP high pain vs. SCI no NP:
↓ Glx ↓ Glx/Ins
Stanwell et al. (63) MRS Thalamus, PFC, ACC Wavelet-based significant testing
p < 0.05
SCI-NP vs. SCI-no NP:
PFC: Mean spectral differences, possible contributions: NAA, Glu, Glx, Cho, taurine and GABA.
ACC: Mean spectral differences, possible contributions: Ins and Asp. Thalamus: not significant
Pattany et al. (64) MRS Thalamus Post hoc t-tests
p < 0.05
SCI-NP vs. SCI-no NP:
↓ NAA and NAA/Ins.
Pain intensity correlated negatively with NAA levels.
Pain intensity correlated positively with Ins levels

Results of studies investigating differences between SCI-NP and SCI-no NP subjects unless stated otherwise. Study order is based on neuroimaging modality as reported in Table 1, starting with structural, DTI, rsfMRI, then MRS. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; Asp, aspartate; BG, basal ganglia; CC, corpus callosum; Cho, choline; Cr, creatine; CST, corticospinal tract; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; dlPM, dorsolateral premotor cortex; FA, fractional anisotropy; FC, functional connectivity; FDR, false-discovery rate; FWE, family-wise error; GABA, gamma (γ)-aminobutyric acid; Glu, glutamate; Glx, glutamate and glutamine; GMV, gray matter volume; Ins, Myo-inositol; k, minimum cluster size; L, left; M1, motor cortex; MD, mean diffusivity; mFG, medial frontal gyrus; mOFC, medial orbital frontal cortex; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; NAA, N-acetyl aspartate; PET, positron emission tomography; PFC, prefrontal cortex; PMC, premotor cortex; PPC, posterior parietal cortex; R, right; rsfMRI, resting-state fMRI; S1, somatosensory cortex 1; S2, somatosensory cortex 2; SCI, spinal cord injury; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; SMA, supplementary motor area; sMRI, structural MRI; SCI NP, SCI subjects with NP; SCI no NP, SCI subjects without NP; SVC, small volume correction; TFCE, threshold-free cluster enhancement; vlPM, ventrolateral premotor cortex; WMV, white matter volume.

↔ No significant changes; ↑ significant increase; ↓ significant decrease.