Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;10:1413. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01413

Table 5.

Neuroimaging studies investigating SCI subjects without NP compared to healthy controls.

References Modality Region of interest(s) Statistical correction Main findings
Chen et al. (53) sMRI Whole brain; S1, M1 and thalamus as region of interests p < 0.05 cluster-level corrected SCI-no pain vs. controls:
↓ GMV in L superior parietal lobule
↓ WMV in R temporal lobe, R occipital lobe and R calcarine gyrus
Chen et al. (54) sMRI rsfMRI Whole brain sMRI: p < 0.0001 uncorrected,
p < 0.05 cluster-level FWE correction;
rsfMRI: p < 0.05 k = 30 (Monte Carlo simulation)
SCI-no pain vs. controls:↓ GMV in L hippocampus, L parahippocampal gyrus, R superior and middle frontal gyrus↔ WMV↓ ALFF in L OFC↓ intranetwork FC in L middle occipital gyrus
Jutzeler et al. (55) sMRI Whole brain; M1, S1, S2, PMC, insula, thalamus, and ACC as regions of interests p < 0.05 FWE SCI-no NP vs. controls:↓ GMV in ACC and M1
Mole et al. (56) sMRI Whole brain:M1, S1, thalamus,
L posterior cingulate, R insula as regions of interests
p < 0.001 uncorrected;
p < 0.05 FWE correction
SCI-no NP vs. controls:
↑ GMV in bilateral S1 and L lateral cuneus
↓ WMV of bilateral pyramids and posterior corona radiata
Gustin et al. (58) DTI Whole brain
p < 0.005 uncorrected,
k = 20
SCI-no NP vs. controls:
↓ FA of PPC-to-midbrain fibers
↓ MD of anterior insula, PPC and dorsolateral PFC, nucleus accumbens, ventroposterior thalamus and PMC
Gustin et al. (61) MRS Thalamus Independent t tests
p < 0.05
SCI-no NP vs. controls:
No significance
Widerström-Noga et al. (62) MRS ACC Independent t tests
p < 0.05
SCI-no NP vs. controls:
No significance
Stanwell et al. (63) MRS Thalamus, PFC, and ACC Wavelet-based significant testing
p < 0.05
SCI-no NP vs. controls: n/a
Pattany et al. (64) MRS Thalamus Post hoc t tests
p < 0.05
SCI-no NP vs. controls:↔ NAA↑ NAA/Ins↓ Ins

Results of studies investigating differences between SCI-no NP subjects and healthy controls unless stated otherwise. Study order is based on neuroimaging modality as reported in Table 1, starting with structural, DTI, rsfMRI, then MRS.

ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; FA, fractional anisotropy; FWE, family-wise error; GMV, gray matter volume; Ins, myo-inositol; k, minimum cluster size; L, left; M1, motor cortex; MD, mean diffusivity; mFG, medial frontal gyrus; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; NAA, N-acetyl aspartate; PFC, prefrontal cortex; PMC, premotor cortex; PPC, posterior parietal cortex; R, right; rsfMRI, resting-state fMRI; S1, somatosensory cortex 1; S2, somatosensory cortex 2; SCI, spinal cord injury; sMRI, structural MRI; NP, neuropathic pain; SCI NP, SCI subjects with NP; SCI no NP, SCI subjects without NP; WMV, white matter volume.

↔ No significant changes; ↑ significant increase; ↓ significant decrease.