Table 2.
Main characteristics of the studies of the current review
| Study | Type | LOE | MCS | Risk of bias | COI | Number of patients | Mean age (y) | Sex | Mean FU (m) | Type of graft | Type of fixation | Mean clinical scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taverna et al. [21] |
Retrospective Non-comparative |
IV | 56 | Selection, detection, and performance | Yes | 26 | 25.5 |
20M 6F |
29.6 | Iliac crest allograft | Two coupled pairs of arthroscopic round endobuttons |
Walch-Duplay score: 93.2 (post-operatively) Rowe score: 96.4 (post-operatively) SSV: 87.4 (post-operatively) |
| Kraus et al. [23] |
Retrospective Non-comparative |
IV | 39 | Selection, detection, and performance | Yes | 15 | 31.4 |
14M 1F |
20.6 | Autologous tricortical iliac crest bone graft | Two bio-compression screws |
Constant score (affected side): 85.8 points Constant score (contra-lateral side): 89.6 points Rowe score: from 37.5 (pre-operatively) to 88.0 points (post-operatively) (significant difference) SSV: from 41.5 (pre-operatively) to 84.5% (post-operatively) (significant difference) WOSI: from 19.2% (pre-operatively) to 76.7% (post-operatively) (significant difference) |
| Anderl et al. [28] |
Prospective Non-comparative |
IV | 53 | Selection, detection, and performance | Yes | 14 (15 shoulders) | 30 |
12M 2F |
25.9 | Implant-free bi-cortical iliac crest bone grafting (autologous) |
Rowe score: from 57.6 (pre-operatively) to 98.6 (post-operatively) (significant difference) Constant score from 70.9 (pre-operatively) to 96.3 (post-operatively) (significant difference) VAS score: 4.4 (pre-operatively) to 0.2 (post-operatively) (significant difference) SSV for sports: 31.4% (pre-operatively) to 95.6% (post-operatively) (significant difference) |
|
| Bock-mann et al. [25] |
Retrospective Non-comparative |
IV | 40 | Selection, detection, and performance | Not rep. | 32 | 31 |
24M 7F |
42 | Iliac crest bone graft (autologous) | Two screws |
WOSI: 71% Adapted constant score: 87 VAS score: 2.1 |
| Zhao et al. [27] |
Retrospective Non-comparative |
IV | 65 | Selection, detection, and performance | No | 52 | 26.3 |
39M 13F |
38.8 | Allogenic iliac bone graft | Sutures |
Oxford shoulder score: from 29.7 pre-operatively to 42.4 post-operatively Rowe score: from 34.7 pre-operatively to 91.8 post-operatively |
| Gian-nakos et al. [22] |
Retrospective Non-comparative |
IV | 43 | Selection, detection, and performance | Yes | 12 | 37.5 |
9M 3F |
28.8 | Re-vision setting, autologous bi-cortical iliac crest graft | 2 cannulated titanium lag screws |
Rowe score: from 16.25 points pre-operatively to 69.58 points post-operatively (significant difference) Walch-Duplay score: from 11.76 points pre-operatively to 76.67 points post-operatively (significant difference) WOSI (only post-operatively): 28.71% |
| Ernst-Brunner et al. [26] |
Retrospective Comparative |
III | 37 | Selection, detection, and performance | Yes | 40 (20 open and 20 arthroscopic procedures) | 30.9 |
35M 5F |
– | Autologous iliac crest bone graft | – | No clinical outcomes. |
| Moroder et al. [24] |
Prospective Randomized |
I | 57 | – | No | 60 (30 open Latarjet, 30 open iliac crest graft procedures) |
31 (Latar-jet) 29 (iliac crest graft) |
56M 4F |
24 | Autologous iliac crest bone graft |
Two screws (Latarjet group) Implant-free press-fit insertion of J-shaped iliac crest bone graft |
WOSI, Rowe, SSV, ASOSS score: insignificant difference between the 2 groups post-operatively (only preoperative Rowe score significantly better in Latarjet group) |
| Scheibel et al. [29] |
Retrospective Non-comparative |
IV | 47 | Selection, detection, and performance | No | 10 | 28.7 |
8M 2F |
37.9 | Tri-cortical autogenous iliac crest bone graft | Two cannulated screws |
Constant score: 88.3, Rowe score: 89.5, Walch-Duplay score: 83.5 MISS: 80.6, WOSI: 82.6% (only post-operative values) |