Section and topic | No. | Quality criteria | Yes | No |
---|---|---|---|---|
Title/Keywords/Introduction | 1 | Were the study hypothesis/aim/objective clearly described | ||
Method | 2 | Were the animal model for the study well-described | ||
3 | Were the method well-described | |||
4 | Were the data collected time point clearly defined | |||
5 | Were the main outcome measures clearly defined | |||
6 | Were the experiment group well compared with the control group | |||
Discussion | 7 | Were the results well-described | ||
8 | Were the articles discussed the limitation |
Kathleen Wells, Julia H. Littell. Study Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Research on Intervention Effects. Research on Social Work Practice. 2009; 19: 52–62.