Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;2020(2):CD001122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001122.pub5

Sharma 2006.

Methods Randomised prospective pilot study, conducted in India
Timing: not stated
Participants 20 women with clomiphene‐resistant PCOS, patent tubes on hysterosalpingography and normal partner semen. Average age of unipolar group was 27.3 (range 21 to 32), and for the bipolar group was 25.5 (range 23 to 30) years
No exclusion criteria detailed.
Interventions Unipolar (n = 10), versus
Bipolar ovarian drilling (n = 10)
The average number of punctures across both groups was 14.85 per ovary
Follow‐up for 3 months and if no evidence of ovulation then started on clomiphene citrate
Outcomes Ovulation and pregnancy rate, androgen and biochemical measurements
Notes Conflict of interest: not stated
Clinical trial registration number: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomly assigned by using computerized random table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details in paper
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No evidence of blinding of researchers or participants
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No details provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Although not stated it appears as though all women randomised were analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk We could not retrieve the original protocol. The outcomes listed in the Methods section were reported in the Results
Other bias Low risk No evidence of other risk of bias