Sharma 2006.
| Methods | Randomised prospective pilot study, conducted in India Timing: not stated |
|
| Participants | 20 women with clomiphene‐resistant PCOS, patent tubes on hysterosalpingography and normal partner semen. Average age of unipolar group was 27.3 (range 21 to 32), and for the bipolar group was 25.5 (range 23 to 30) years No exclusion criteria detailed. |
|
| Interventions | Unipolar (n = 10), versus Bipolar ovarian drilling (n = 10) The average number of punctures across both groups was 14.85 per ovary Follow‐up for 3 months and if no evidence of ovulation then started on clomiphene citrate |
|
| Outcomes | Ovulation and pregnancy rate, androgen and biochemical measurements | |
| Notes | Conflict of interest: not stated Clinical trial registration number: not stated |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomly assigned by using computerized random table" |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details in paper |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No evidence of blinding of researchers or participants |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Although not stated it appears as though all women randomised were analysed |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | We could not retrieve the original protocol. The outcomes listed in the Methods section were reported in the Results |
| Other bias | Low risk | No evidence of other risk of bias |