Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;17(2):415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020415

Table 3.

Comparison of tAs and iAs concentrations (mg kg−1) in infant rice-based foods in the current study and the published literature (values are mean ± standard error, range in brackets).

Product Category Sampling Place n Mean As Concentration Reference
tAs iAs
Rice milk Australia 3 0.428 ± 0.002 1/0.020 ± 0 2 0.160 ± 0 1/0.008 ± 0 2 Present study
Switzerland 6 0.015 (0.011–0.025) 3 0.009 (0.007–0.013) 3 [35]
Rice pasta Australia 3 0.186 ± 0.003 0.155 ± 0.005 Present study
Spain 4 0.192 (0.132–0.285) 0.136 (0.794–0.170) [19]
Rice cereal Australia 12 0.134 ± 0.023 Present study
Australia 2 0.268 ± 0.006 0.073 ± 0.006 [23]
United States 105 0.132 (0.050–0.723) 0.091 (0.023–0.283) [16]
United Kingdom 53 0.119 1 (0.042–0.396) 0.075 (0.008–0.323) [11]
Switzerland 7 0.278 (0.065–0.630) 0.204 (0.046–0.331) [35]
Spain 9 0.309 ± 0.011 0.107 ± 0.021 [9]
Rice crackers Australia 21 0.132 ± 0.010 0.094 ± 0.012 Present study
United States 199 0.121 (0.009–1.931) 0.079 (0.008–0.273) [16]
United Kingdom 97 0.141 4 (0.019–0.328) 0.111 (0.018–0.211) [11]
Switzerland 25 0.168 (0.047–0.361) 0.134 (0.040–0.279) [35]

1 rice milk samples in powder form; 2 The As concentrations were recalculated based on manufacturer-recommended serving size in order to compare with liquid rice milk. 3 Rice milk samples in liquid form; 4 The tAs result from Signes-Pastor et al. [11] were based on ΣAs species and therefore, should only be used as an indication for tAs.