Table 4.
QTL | Phenotypic Data Set a | Closest Marker | Peak Position | LOD b | QTL Interval (cM) | R2 (%)c | Additive Effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYrPI181410.wgp-4AS | PSTv-4-IT | IWB9590 | 43.0 | 3.3 | 41.0–45.0 | 11.2 *** | 0.5 |
PSTv-14-IT | IWB9590 | 43.0 | 2.7 | 40.0–44.0 | 5.4 ** | 0.4 | |
QYrPI181410.wgp-4BL | PSTv-4-IT | IWB6961 | 71.0 | 3.6 | 68.0.0–88.0 | 8.6 ** | 0.5 |
PSTv-14-IT | IWB6961 | 71.0 | 2.5 | 70.0–90.0 | 11.0 ** | 0.8 | |
QYrPI181410.wgp-5BL.1 | PSTv-4-IT | IWB73753 | 211.0 | 4.7 | 203.0–213.0 | 15.1 *** | 0.6 |
PSTv-14-IT | IWB73753 | 211.0 | 4.5 | 203.0–213.0 | 14.0 *** | 0.7 |
a In the phenotypic data sets, IT = infection type, the disease reactions of RILs were tested using two races, PSTv-4 and PSTv-14, in greenhouse condition. b LOD = logarithm of odds. c R2 = the percentage of phenotypic variation the QTL explained.