Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 7;20(2):340. doi: 10.3390/s20020340

Table 3.

RMSE comparison with current literature.

Author Estimation Parameter Platform Estimator Computation Cost Error Max (RMSE) (deg)
Qingyuan Zhu et al. [38] Roll Prototype Vehicle GA 100 ms 1.8 (Roll)
Pitch BP NN 2.1 (Pitch)
Hamad Ahmed et al. [24] Roll Standard Vehicle KF 20–25 ms 0.1 (Roll)
Pitch 0.13 (Pitch)
Yaw 0.01 (Yaw)
Javier Garcia Guzman et al. [39] Roll Standard Vehicle KF 14.2 ms 0.76 (Roll)
Pitch UKF 6.76 ms 0.63 (Pitch)
Daehee Won et al. [40] Roll Standard Vehicle EKF 21.4 ms 0.28 (Roll)
Pitch 0.55 (Pitch)
RobertoG.Valenti et al. [41] Roll Standard Vehicle Pseudo 1.42 μs 1.32 (Roll)
Pitch Madwick 1.19 (Pitch)
Yaw EKF
XudongWen et al. [42] Roll UAV NCF 41 ms 1.16 (Roll)
Pitch DNCF 0.50 (Pitch)
Yaw - -
Rodrigo Gonzalez et al. [43] Roll Standard Vehicle KF 0.2 s 0.362 (Roll)
Pitch 0.339 (Pitch)
Yaw 1.839 (Yaw)
Proposed scheme Roll Standard Vehicle CF 3.2 ms 0.6738 (Roll)
Pitch 0.7280 (Pitch)