Table 3.
RMSE comparison with current literature.
| Author | Estimation Parameter | Platform | Estimator | Computation Cost | Error Max (RMSE) (deg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingyuan Zhu et al. [38] | Roll | Prototype Vehicle | GA | 100 ms | 1.8 (Roll) |
| Pitch | BP NN | 2.1 (Pitch) | |||
| Hamad Ahmed et al. [24] | Roll | Standard Vehicle | KF | 20–25 ms | 0.1 (Roll) |
| Pitch | 0.13 (Pitch) | ||||
| Yaw | 0.01 (Yaw) | ||||
| Javier Garcia Guzman et al. [39] | Roll | Standard Vehicle | KF | 14.2 ms | 0.76 (Roll) |
| Pitch | UKF | 6.76 ms | 0.63 (Pitch) | ||
| Daehee Won et al. [40] | Roll | Standard Vehicle | EKF | 21.4 ms | 0.28 (Roll) |
| Pitch | 0.55 (Pitch) | ||||
| RobertoG.Valenti et al. [41] | Roll | Standard Vehicle | Pseudo | 1.42 μs | 1.32 (Roll) |
| Pitch | Madwick | 1.19 (Pitch) | |||
| Yaw | EKF | ||||
| XudongWen et al. [42] | Roll | UAV | NCF | 41 ms | 1.16 (Roll) |
| Pitch | DNCF | 0.50 (Pitch) | |||
| Yaw | - | - | |||
| Rodrigo Gonzalez et al. [43] | Roll | Standard Vehicle | KF | 0.2 s | 0.362 (Roll) |
| Pitch | 0.339 (Pitch) | ||||
| Yaw | 1.839 (Yaw) | ||||
| Proposed scheme | Roll | Standard Vehicle | CF | 3.2 ms | 0.6738 (Roll) |
| Pitch | 0.7280 (Pitch) |