Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;21(2):676. doi: 10.3390/ijms21020676

Table 3.

Statistical analysis and ratios of differential gene expression between groups.

Comparison SMAD7
FC (PFDR)
S1PR1
FC (PFDR)
TNF
FC (PFDR)
SMAD2
FC (PFDR)
SMAD3
FC (PFDR)
SMAD4
FC (PFDR)
HD vs. RRMS rem −2.29
(0.001)
−1.28
(0.041)
−1.19
(0.405)
−1.28
(0.870)
−1.17
(0.720)
−1.12
(0.155)
HD vs. RRMS rel −2.17
(0.001)
−1.31
(0.010)
−1.34
(0.123)
−1.05
(0.372)
−1.18
(0.130)
−1.17
(0.110)
HD vs.CD rel −4.65
(0.001)
−1.59
(0.001)
−2.25
(0.001)
−1.40
(0.001)
−1.64
(0.001)
−1.60
(< 0.001)
RRMS rem vs. RRMS rel 1.05
(1.000)
−1.02
(1.000)
−1.13
(0.690)
1.02
(1.000)
1.01
(1.000)
−1.04
(1.738)
RRMS rem vs. CD rel −2.02
(0.101)
−1.24
(0.158)
−1.89
(0.003)
−1.3
(0.008)
−1.40
(0.023)
−1.43
(0.004)
RRMS rel vs. CD rel −2.14
(0.046)
−1.22
(0.137)
−1.67
(0.006)
−1.33
(0.006)
−1.38
(0.016)
−1.40
(0.006)

HD, healthy donor; RRMS, remitting-recurrent multiple sclerosis; CD, Crohn’s disease; rel, relapsing; rem, remitting; PFDR, P value false discovery range.