Table 5.
Imagery characteristics, affect ratings, and entrapment at baseline and in the diary
| Baseline | Diary | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | M | SD | k | M | SD | ICCa | |
| Compellingness | 19 | 6.84 | 1.77 | 89 | 5.77 | 1.22 | 0.21 |
| Vividness | 19 | 7.32 | 2.01 | 89 | 7.75 | 1.29 | 0.29 |
| Controllability | 19 | 2.37 | 1.21 | 89 | 3.23 | 1.59 | 0.22 |
| Nowness | 19 | 4.11 | 2.81 | 89 | 4.42 | 1.63 | 0.29 |
| Distress | 19 | 6.89 | 1.73 | 89 | 6.00 | 1.36 | 0.33 |
| Comfort | 19 | 2.79 | 2.64 | 89 | 3.03 | 1.87 | 0.44 |
| Positive affect after image | 19 | 0.55 | 0.41 | 89 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.49 |
| Negative affect after image | 19 | 2.15 | 0.76 | 89 | 1.80 | 0.62 | 0.43 |
| Positive affect daily | – | – | – | 189 | .88 | 0.56 | 0.47 |
| Negative affect daily | – | – | – | 189 | .90 | 0.55 | 0.41 |
| Entrapment Scale | 19 | 2.01 | 0.74 | – | – | – | – |
| Entrapment daily | – | – | – | 189 | 2.93 | .81 | 0.37 |
For the diary data, the within-person reliability was calculated according to Cranford et al. [63]. According to George and Mallery [65], the values are interpreted as excellent if > .9, as good if > .8, as acceptable if > .7, as questionable if > .6, aspoor if > .5, and as unacceptable if < .5
aIntraclass correlation coefficient; values below .50 indicate that variance is predominantly due to within-person-fluctuation