Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;19:65. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3145-8

Table 2.

Density of Anopheles larvae in different habitat types in Darge and Ghibe study sites (November 2014 to October 2016)

Study site  Habitat type (n) Total no. of dips Total larval count No. of larvae/dip (Mean ± se) Total pupal count No. of pupae/dip (Mean ± se)
Darge Borrow pit (3) 16 228 14.3 ± 8.6 8 0.5 ± 0.1
Hoof print (8) 52 286 5.5 ± 1.2 8 0.2 ± 0.1
Rain pool (24) 146 806 5.5 ± 1.5 84 0.6 ± 0.2
Pools at river edge (38) 231 3063 13.0 ± 2.1 148 0.7 ± 0.2
Pools in drying 20 704 35.2 ± 7.9 70 3.5 ± 0.8
river beds (4)
Rock pool (7) 42 271 6.5 ± 3.4 27 0.6 ± 0.3
Tire track (7) 47 300 6.4 ± 3.2 22 0.5 ± 0.2
Swamp (5) 43 92 2.1 ± 0.2 13 0.3 ± 0.1
Total 597 5750 9.6 380 0.6
Ghibe Borrow pit (4) 42 471 11.2 ± 6.3 23 0.5 ± 0.4
Hoof print (9) 83 328 3.9 ± 0.6 9 0.1 ± 0
Rain pool (12) 67 800 11.9 ± 5.1 6 0.1 ± 0
Pools at river edge (24) 145 1146 7.9 ± 1.9 48 0.3 ± 0.1
Rock pool (4) 20 38 1.9 ± 0.5 0 0 ± 0
Tire track (17) 138 737 5.3 ± 2.5 28 0.2 ± 0.1
Swamp (1) 15 7 0.5 ± 0.0 0 0 ± 0
Total 510 3527 6.9 114 0.2

Values in italics for mean larval and pupal density indicate mean larval or pupal density of each study site

n number of larval habitat sampled, se standard error of the mean