Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct 3;66(10):2009–2016. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15465

Table 2.

Challenges to Implementing Patient Priorities Care (PPC)

Workflow Challenges Strategies to Address Challenges and Improve Workflow
  • PCPs and cardiologists have limited time for training and ongoing collaborative learning

  • Leadership support; PCPs and cardiologists are reimbursed for training time

  • Twice-monthly 15- to 20-minute collaborative learning sessions at lunch (PCPs) and monthly before clinic (cardiologists) and during in-person meetings

  • Clinicians unclear about identifying appropriate patients

  • Administrative identification with PCP review; clinicians and implementation team discuss in monthly meetings

  • Patient invitation process slow

  • Clinicians concerned that eliciting patient priorities increases burden for complex patients

  • Instituted brochures and posters for clinician offices; scripts for PCPs; discussed at monthly meetings; clinicians receive list of eligible patient upcoming appointments

  • Comments from patients regarding how much they liked PPC were helpful, as was feedback from other clinicians

  • Clinicians differ about how to initiate PPC after patient completes priorities identification

  • Some clinicians preferred to devote a visit to initial discussion of PPC; others incorporated the discussion in a regular visit. Both options are reasonable

  • Clinicians concerned about patient copayments if extra visit and about reimbursement for extra time

  • PCP visit can be incorporated into an extended scheduled visit; recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services codes for advanced care planning and chronic care management can be used.

  • Clinicians don’t document priorities-aligned decision-making

  • Discussed at monthly PCP clinician/implementation team meetings (every 2 months for cardiologists); feedback report provided to clinicians

  • Workflow and communication between PCP and cardiology offices difficult to implement

  • Cardiology and PCP offices work together to identify PPC patients before they see cardiologist. Flag for PPC patients implemented in cardiologists’ EHR

  • Referral form emphasizes question PCP wants cardiologist to address; priorities template and PCP note faxed to cardiology offices

  • Clinicians may not address patient priorities at follow-up visits.

  • Issue emphasized in monthly (PCP) and every 2 months (cardiologist) meetings

Decision-making challenges Strategies to Address Challenges and Support PPC Decision-making
  • Clinicians (PCPs and cardiologists) need to agree to participating in PPC

  • Healthcare system leadership support; PPC discussed at clinician educational meetings; clinical champions engaged; nationally prominent PCPs and cardiologists helped develop and endorse PPC; national experts in practice change and clinician training engaged in the training; activate patients and caregivers through training to take ownership of health priorities

  • Some clinicians thought they were already providing care aligned with patient goals and priorities

  • Reframe approach from being different from usual care to being a systematic method for providing person-centered care

  • Culture, clinical interventions, quality metrics, and payment remain driven by evidence-based disease guidelines and individual disease-based metrics continue to drive culture, clinical interventions, quality metrics, and payment

  • Training included discussion of some usual measures relevant to patients with MCCs, such as Patient-Centered Medical Home metrics (goals and burden). It is necessary to partner with national organizations to develop quality metrics and guidelines to support patient priorities aligned decision-making.

  • Clinicians lack experience in discussing uncertainty, trade-offs, and clinical trajectories, and in addressing patient-provider and provider-provider disagreements regarding patient priorities

  • Training with national experts and collaborative learning helped clinicians develop strategies to address uncertainty and trade-offs in individuals with MCCs. Patient scenarios and scripts are used to identify strategies to improve patient-provider and provider-priorities communication

PCP = primary care practitioner; EHR = electronic health record; MCCs = multiple chronic conditions.