Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Law Econ. 2019 May;62(2):373–402. doi: 10.1086/704008

Table 2:

State Disability and Age Discrimination Laws, 2016

Age discrimination laws Disability discrimination laws

State (City) Minimum
firm size
Larger
damages than
ADEA
Minimum
firm size
Larger damages than ADA Broader (medical)
definition of disability

Alabama (Birmingham) 20 No No law No law No law
Alaska (Anchorage) 1 Yes 1 Yes No
Arizona (Phoenix) 15 No 15 No (no punitive damages) No
Arkansas (Little Rock) No law No law 9 No (same as ADA) No
California (Los Angeles) 5 Yes 5 Yes (uncapped) Yes (“limits” only)
Colorado (Denver) 1 No 1 No (same as ADA) No
Connecticut (Hartford) 3 No 3 No Yes
Delaware(Wilmington) 4 Yes 4 No (same as ADA) No
Florida (Miami) 15 Yes 15 No (punitive capped at
$100k)
No
Georgia (Atlanta) 1 No 15 No (no punitive) No
Hawaii (Honolulu) 1 Yes 1 Yes (uncapped) No
Idaho (Boise) 5 Yes 5 No (punitive capped at $10k) No
Illinois (Chicago) 15 Yes 1 No (no punitive) Yes
Indiana (Indianapolis) 1 No 15 No (no punitive) No
Iowa (Des Moines) 4 Yes 4 No (no punitive) No
Kansas (Wichita) 4 Yes 4 No (no punitive damages,
damages capped at $2k)
No
Kentucky (Louisville) 8 Yes 15 No (no punitive) No
Louisiana (New Orleans) 20 Yes 15 No (no punitive) No
Maine (Portland) 1 Yes 1 Yes No
Maryland (Baltimore) 1 Yes 1 No (same as ADA, no
punitive damages in
Baltimore County for
employers < 15)
No
Massachusetts (Boston) 6 Yes 6 Yes (uncapped) No
Michigan (Detroit) 1 Yes 1 No (no punitive) No
Minnesota (Minneapolis) 1 Yes 1 No (punitive capped at $25k) Yes (“materially limits” only)
Mississippi (Jackson) No law No law No law No law No law
Missouri (Kansas City) 6 Yes 6 Yes (uncapped) No
Montana (Billings) 1 Yes 1 No (no punitive) No
Nebraska (Lincoln) 20 No 15 No (no punitive) No
Nevada (Las Vegas) 15 No 15 No (no punitive) No
New Hampshire (Manchester) 6 Yes 6 No (no punitive) No
New Jersey (Trenton) 1 Yes 1 Yes (uncapped) Yes
New Mexico (Albuquerque) 4 Yes 4 No (no punitive) No
New York (New York) 4 Yes 4 No (no punitive) Yes
North Carolina (Charlotte) 15 No 15 No (no punitive) No
North Dakota (Bismarck) 1 No 1 No (no damages) No
Ohio (Columbus) 4 Yes 4 Yes (uncapped) No
Oklahoma (Oklahoma City) 1 No 1 No (no punitive) No
Oregon (Portland) 1 Yes 6 Yes (uncapped) No
Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh) 4 No 4 No (no punitive) No
Rhode Island (Providence) 4 Yes 4 Yes (uncapped) No
South Carolina (Columbia) 15 No 15 No (same as ADA) No
South Dakota (Sioux Falls) No law No law 1 No (no punitive) No
Tennessee (Memphis) 8 Yes 8 No (no punitive) No
Texas (Houston) 15 Yes 15 No (same as ADA) No
Utah (Salt Lake City) 15 No 15 No (no punitive) No
Vermont (Burlington) 1 Yes 1 Yes (uncapped) No
Virginia (Virginia Beach) 6 No 1 No (no punitive) No
Washington (Seattle) 8 Yes 8 No (no punitive) Yes
West Virginia (Charleston) 12 No 12 Yes (uncapped) No
Wisconsin (Milwaukee) 1 No 1 No (no punitive) No
Wyoming (Cheyenne) 2 No 2 No (no punitive) No

Notes: State laws are as of 2016. Age discrimination laws are from Neumark and Song (2013) and disability discrimination laws are from Neumark et al. (2017), but both are updated to 2016. For Maryland, under Minimum firm size, we list the value 1. This is the case for Baltimore County, from which our data come; the minimum is 15 for the rest of the state. For the states listed as “Yes” under Larger damages than ADA, but not uncapped, details are as follows: Alaska – uncapped compensatory damages, punitive damages capped above ADA levels; Maine – exceeds ADA cap for firms of 201+ employees. As discussed more in-depth in Online Appendix OB, for Connecticut the evidence favors punitive damages not being available, and compensatory damages were definitely not available.