Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;287(1919):20192705. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2705

Table 1.

Prey consumption by T. amboinensis larvae feeding on conventional or gnotobiotic A. aegypti larvae. The total number of T. amboinensis larvae assayed for each treatment group is listed in the first column. The number of prey consumed by each instar was tracked daily until at least one individual had pupated in a treatment cohort. Mean values (±s.e.) are shown. Separate ANOVA analyses were performed for each instar. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Tukey–Kramer HSD test, p < 0.05). ANOVA detected no differences between treatments for either first (F2,219 = 2.012, p = 0.136) or fourth instars (F2,97 = 1.062, p = 0.350).

N first instar second instar third instar fourth instar
Comamonas 200 10.00 ± 0.00 14.72 ± 0.21A 18.87 ± 0.19A 31.65 ± 1.23
E. coli 368 10.06 ± 0.03 14.93 ± 0.12A 18.28 ± 0.15A 29.92 ± 1.00
conventional 198 10.00 ± 0.00 14.00 ± 0.17B 17.51 ± 0.24B 29.21 ± 0.42