Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 7;26(5):466–477. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i5.466

Table 2.

Diagnostic value of Kyoto classification for Helicobacter pylori infection

Endoscopic findings Ref. Year No. of subjects Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Diagnosis for current H. pylori infection
Enlarged folds Kato et al[59] 2013 275 58.5 79.5 76.9 62.2
Enlarged folds Mao et al[60] 2016 256 60.2 92.3 86.0 74.6
Enlarged folds Yoshii et al[61] 2019 498 23.1 96.6 56.2 87.0
Nodularity Laine et al[57] 1995 52 32.1 95.8 90.0 54.8
Nodularity Kato et al[59] 2013 275 5.3 98.8 75.0 59.4
Nodularity Yoshii et al[61] 2019 498 6.4 98.3 41.7 84.9
Diffuse redness Kato et al[59] 2013 275 83.4 66.9 73.8 78.4
Diffuse redness Mao et al[60] 2016 256 57.5 95.8 91.5 74.7
Diffuse redness Yoshii et al[61] 2019 498 60.0 94.7 65.6 93.3
Diagnosis for negative H. pylori infection
RAC Yagi et al[58] 2002 557 91.1 97.9 95.0 96.2
RAC Kato et al[59] 2013 275 93.6 48.0 87.0 66.8
RAC Mao et al[60] 2016 256 86.7 90.2 87.5 89.6
RAC Garcés-Durán et al[62] 2019 140 100.0 49.0 47.3 100.0

PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; RAC: Regular arrangement of collecting venules; H. pylori: Helicobacter pylori.