Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2020 Jan-Mar;34(1):1–9. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000338

Table 2.

Marginal Effects of Amyloid PET Scan, Cognition, and Everyday Function on Risk Taking (n=1,551 dyads)

Model 1: Scan recipient willingness to accept
risk
Model 2: Risk care partner believes scan
recipient will accept
Model 3: Risk
taking
Discordancea
(n=1,551)
Part 1:
Probability
willing to
accept >0
risk
(n=1,551)
Part 2:
Amount of risk
conditional on
willing to
accept >0
(n=996)
Unconditional
Marginal Effect
(95% CI)
Part 1:
Probability
willing to
accept >0
risk
(n=1,551)
Part 2: Amount
of risk
conditional on
willing to
accept >0
(n=1,130
Unconditional
Marginal Effect
(95% CI)
Marginal Effect
(95% CI)
Conditional
Marginal
Effect
(95% CI)
Conditional
Marginal
Effect
(95% CI)
Conditional
Marginal
Effect
(95% CI)
Conditional
Marginal Effect
(95% CI)
Amyloid PET scan positive (ref = negative) 0.05*
(0.01, 0.10)
4.97*
(0.37, 9.57)
5.62**
(1.98, 9.25)
0.12***
(0.07, 0.17)
4.01
(−0.33, 8.34)
7.62***
(4.07, 11.18)
2.58
(−2.00, 7.17)
Scan recipient characteristics (reported by scan recipient)
TICS-M 0.01**
(0.00, 0.01)
−0.73***
(−1.12, −0.33)
−0.19
(−0.51, 0.13)
0.00
(0.00, 0.01)
−0.05
(−0.41, 0.31)
0.05
(−0.27, 0.36)
0.21
(−0.18, 0.60)
Age, y 0.00
(−0.01, 0.00)
0.29
(−0.10, 0.69)
−0.01
(−0.32, 0.31)
Female −0.10***
(−0.16, −0.05)
4.89*
(0.17, 9.61)
−1.52
(−5.30, 2.49)
Marital status (ref = married/living with partner)
 Separated/divorced 0.16**
(0.04, 0.27)
−14.37*
(−25.60, −3.14)
−4.15
(−13.68, 5.39)
 Widowed 0.10
(−0.01, 0.20)
−3.14
(−13.37, 7.10)
2.21
(−6.46, 10.87)
 Never married 0.09
(−0.12, 0.30)
−9.78
(−29.89, 10.33)
−2.93
(−19.29, 13.43)
Education (ref = high school graduate or less)
 Some college 0.10*
(0.02, 0.17)
−0.58
(−7.66, 6.50)
4.22
(−1.44, 9.88)
 Bachelor's degree 0.08*
(0.00, 0.16)
−3.86
(−11.09, 3.37)
1.49
(−4.22, 7.21)
 Advanced degree 0.07
(0.00, 0.15)
−7.41*
(−14.31, −0.50)
−1.36
(−6.74, 4.01)
Race (ref = White)
 African American 0.08
(−0.10, 0.25)
−4.90
(−20.05, 10.24)
0.06
(−12,89, 13.01)
 Other 0.07
(−0.09, 0.23)
3.29
(−10.26, 16.83)
5.39
(−6.82, 17.60)
Care partner characteristics (reported by care partner)
ECog-12 reported for person with cognitive impairment 0.03
(−0.01, 0.06)
0.71
(−2.57, 3.98)
1.64
(−1.03, 4.32)
0.06***
(0.02, 0.09)
3.99*
(0.91, 7.07)
5.20***
(2.56, 7.83)
3.42*
(0.11, 6.72)
Age, y −0.01*
(−0.01, 0.00)
0.57***
(0.30, 0.85)
0.28*
(0.04, 0.52)
0.28
(−0.02, 0.58)
Female −0.02
(−0.07, 0.03)
4.09
(−0.15, 8.32)
2.24
(−1.38, 5.87)
3.54
(−1.08, 8.16)
Education (ref = high school graduate or less)
 Some college 0.04
(−0.03, 0.12)
−2.77
(−9.11, 3.56)
0.00
(−5.57, 5.57)
−3.32
(−10.09, 3.46)
 Bachelor's degree 0.01
(−0.06, 0.09)
−7.74*
(−14.12, −1.36)
−4.83
(−10.34, 0.68)
−7.16*
(−13.96, −0.37)
 Advanced degree 0.06
(−0.01, 0.13)
−10.51***
(−16.77, −4.25)
−5.23
(−10.67, 0.22)
−3.32
(−10.04, 3.41)
Race (ref = White)
 African American −0.03
(−0.21, 0.15)
12.17
(−3.63, 27.98)
7.28
(−7.12, 21.68)
10.20
(−6.50, 26.91)
 Other 0.02
(−0.13, 0.16)
1.75
(−10.82, 14.31)
1.96
(−9.19, 13.12)
3.18
(−10.69, 17.05)
Relationship to scan recipient (ref = spouse)
 Child −0.09
(−0.22, 0.03)
2.11
(−7.41, 11.63)
−2.53
(−10.62, 5.57)
−1.07
(−11.41, 9.27)
 Other 0.08
(−0.07, 0.14)
10.35
(−0.15, 20.84)
11.51*
(1.28, 21.74)
13.69*
(1.52, 25.85)
Someone else is the one person most involved in helping make decisions about the scan recipient’s health care if they are no longer able (ref = care partner) 0.03
(−0.07, 0.14)
8.42
(−0.48, 17.33)
Yes, the scan recipient has discussed their preferences for who should make health care decision if they are no longer able to make it (ref = no) 0.06
(−0.01, 0.13)
9.30
(−0.24, 18.84)
0.58
(−4.68, 5.84)
11.28*
(0.71, 21.84)

CI: Confidence interval

a

risk-taking discordance = care partner risk – scan recipient risk

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001