TABLE 2.
Antimicrobial agent | Number of isolates classified by |
SVM |
SCM |
||
phenotype (R, S) | Number of isolates predicted to be TP and TN (TP, TN) | Correlation of phenotype to the model prediction | Number of isolates predicted to be TP and TN (TP, TN) | Correlation of phenotype to the model prediction | |
Tetracycline | (58, 38) | (55, 38) | p < 2.2e−16 | (50, 38) | p < 2.2e−16 |
Ampicillin | (19, 77) | (19, 77) | p < 2.2e−16 | (19, 77) | p < 2.2e−16 |
Sulfisoxazole | (46, 50) | (46, 50) | p < 2.2e−16 | (46, 50) | p < 2.2e−16 |
Trimethoprim | (16, 80) | (16, 80) | p < 2.3e−16 | (16, 80) | p < 2.3e−16 |
Enrofloxacin | (6, 90) | (6, 90) | p < 1.1e−09 | (6, 90) | p < 1.1e−09 |
R resistant, S sensitive. Correlation between phenotype and model predictions were calculated using Fisher’s exact test in python.