Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 6;11:21. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00021

Table 1.

Summary of pilot field study to evaluate stability of topically applied dsRNA on soybean plants using the QuantiGene assay.

Treatment Application rates (target) and timing Spray rate (liters per hectare) Carrier Sampling Residue level average concentration4 ng/g fw (min.–max.)
1 (Control, 1 plot) Untreated 187 Ultrapure water plus Silwet L-77 at 0.5% v/v 12 whole plants; plus 1 kg grain at maturity N/A
2 (2 replicate plots) 59.3 g ai/ha1 at three separate applications: V4/R1, V10/R3, and 7 days before harvest 187 12 whole plants per plot collected and pooled for analysis at 0,3, and 7 DAT2; plus 1 kg grain at maturity 0 DAT2: 4166 (4158-4174) 3 DAT2: 242 (235-249) 7 DAT2: 66.23 (56.01-76.44) Seeds: 0.19 (0.15-0.23)
3 (2 replicate plots) 59.3 g ai/ha1 at two separate applications: V4/R1, and V10/R3 187 12 whole plants per plot collected and pooled for analysis at 0,3, and 7 DAT3; plus 1 kg grain at maturity 0 DAT3: 1317 (1014-1619) 3 DAT3: 50.33 (50.17-50.49) 7 DAT3: 25.66 (25.47-25.85) Grain: Not Detected (< LOD)

1For treatment 2 actual applied rates were 54.9–63.9 g ai/ha. For treatment 3 actual applied rates were 57.2–59.4 g ai/ha.

2Days after treatment (DAT) refers to time point following initial application at V4/R1.

3Days after treatment (DAT) refers to time point following second application at V10/R3.

4The average residue concentration was calculated at each sampling interval for two replicate plots for treatments 2 and 3. dsRNA concentrations for each replicate plot provided in parenthesis.

Assay’s LOD, 0.0015 ng/g fw; Assay’s LOQ, 0.0180 ng/g fw; fw, fresh weight; N/A, not applicable.