Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 21;2003(3):CD003066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003066

Comparison 2. Prophylactic studies: CSF versus control.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 All cause mortality to 10 days after intervention complete 3 359 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.24, 1.44]
1.1 G‐CSF 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 GM‐CSF 3 359 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.24, 1.44]
2 Sepsis incidence to 10 days after intervention complete, in neutropenic / neutropenia high risk infants 1 31 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.25, 1.39]
3 Sepsis incidence to 10 days after intervention complete, stratified by sepsis identification criteria 3 359 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.71, 1.21]
3.1 Sepsis identified by clinical plus microbiological criteria 1 75 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.36, 1.20]
3.2 Sepis identified by either clinical or microbiological criteria 2 284 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.76, 1.37]