Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 1;12(1):117. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010117

Table 5.

Results from the Cox models for overall survival from liver metastasis.

Cohort 1 (N = 80, 80 Events)
Comparison Hazard Ratio (#) LL95% CI UL95% CI p-value
Eye Treatment to Metastasis Time (*) 0.83 0.70 0.97 0.022
Liver-directed only vs. Systemic 0.81 0.45 1.46 0.483
Liver-directed + Systemic vs. Liver-directed only 0.35 0.14 0.86 0.023
Liver-directed + Systemic vs. Systemic 0.28 0.12 0.65 0.003
Cohort 2 (N = 194, Number of Events = 193, 4 Patients with Systemic only Tx Excluded)
Comparison Hazard Ratio (#) LL95% CI UL95% CI p-value
Female vs. Male 0.65 0.48 0.87 0.003
Liver-directed + Systemic vs. Liver-directed only 0.58 0.42 0.80 0.001
Cohort 3 (N = 443, Number of Events = 365, 9 Patients with Systemic only Tx Excluded)
Comparison Hazard Ratio (#) LL95% CI UL95% CI p-value
Female vs. Male 0.75 0.61 0.93 0.003
Age 60+ vs. < 60 1.32 1.07 1.64 0.003
Liver-directed + Systemic vs. Liver-directed only <0.001 (&)

(#) factor increase or decrease in the hazard of dying corresponding to the groups compared; (*) the reported Hazard Ratio corresponds to doubling the Eye Treatment to Metastasis Time; (&) Supremum-test of significance of time-varying coefficient in multiplicative hazard regression model. LL = Lower limit; CI = Confidence Interval; UL = Upper Limit; Tx = Treatment.