Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Ailani 1999 | Doxycycline versus standard therapy ‐ latter arm not differentiated to regimens with atypical coverage and those without such coverage |
Aubier 1996 | Pooled analysis of 2 studies (1 = this paper) Sparfloxacin versus comparator arm, including erythromycin The results of studies are combined, thus no differentiation between atypical and non‐atypical coverage Note: very large study (N = 1137 |
Chokshi 2007 | Retrospective observational cohort study |
Donowitz 1997 | Outpatients |
Fass 1989 | Study of general serious infections Of 98 participants, 29 were non‐randomized but included with randomized participants in the analysis Only 21/98 participants with pneumonia, some may be nosocomial |
File 1997 | Atypical coverage (macrolide or doxycycline) could be added to non‐atypical arm at investigator's discretion (if atypical pathogens were suspected or proven) |
Fink 1994 | Of 402 participants randomized, 78% were diagnosed with nosocomial pneumonia |
Fong 1995 | Outpatients |
Geijo Martinez 2002 | Non‐atypical group were given a macrolide optionally |
Hagberg 2002 | Outpatients |
Hoepelman 1993 |
|
Katz 2004 | In the typical arm, patients could receive azithromycin or/and flagyl |
Khajotia 1990 | Over 80% lower respiratory tract infection without parenchymal involvement per chest X‐ray. No separate information given for the (15 + 7) patients with CAP |
Kinasewitz 1991 | Outpatients |
Krumpe 1999 | Study of treatment of severe infections: of 540 patients enrolled, 310 were diagnosed with pneumonia, of whom more than 50% (57% of original patients) were diagnosed with nosocomial pneumonia |
Kuzman 2005 | In the typical arm 30% received doxycycline |
Leophonte 1999 | Meta‐analysis of 5 trials, out of which 2 are included and 2 are excluded in this study; the fifth is yet to be located |
Levine 1989 | > 30% dropout rate (45/113 patients) |
Lode 1987 | Study of general severe clinical infections. Pneumonia patients 25/66, some may be nosocomial (no response from trial author) |
Lode 1990 | Reports 4 trials. The first is included in our study and the second compares two quinolones. The third and the forth have insufficient data regarding the study populations and outcomes. Not published elsewhere |
Lode 1998 | Retroactive analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials, concentrating on CAP patients with pneumococcal bacteraemia. Relevant studies were extracted and analyzed separately |
Lode 2004 | Both ambulatory and hospitalized patients could be included in the study but that information was not recorded. Therefore, the proportion of hospitalized patients is unknown |
Mendoca 2004 | In the typical arm 11% received a macrolide antibiotic |
Mouton 1991 | Non‐atypical group were given amoxicillin and/or erythromycin |
O'Doherty 1997 | Outpatients |
Ott 2008 | Study of aspiration pneumonia and lung abscess |
Peacock 1987 | Study of general serious infections. Small number of pneumonia patients (7 and 4) |
Plouffe 1996 | Ofloxacin versus standard therapy ‐ latter arm not differentiated to regimens with atypical coverage and those without such coverage |
Rahav 2004 | Outpatients |
Siami 1995 | Of 54 randomized patients, 89% were diagnosed with nosocomial pneumonia and only 11% diagnosed with CAP |
Sifuentes 1989 | Study of general severe infections. Small number of pneumonia patients. Data of mortality not given separately |
Snydman 1995 | Previously published (Fink 1994, excluded due to a high percentage of nosocomial pneumonia in enrolled patients) |
Stocks 1989 | Outpatients |
Sujata 2008 | In the typical arm, patients could receive macrolide |
Torres 2003 | Outpatients |
Trenholme 1989 |
|
Welte 2005 | In the typical arm, patients could receive erythromycin |
Wollschlager 1987 |
|
CAP: community‐acquired pneumonia